Lessons from working across fields to develop a framework for informed choices

Stewart, R., Aronson, J.K., Barends, E., Boruch, R., Brennan, M.L., Chislett, J., Cunliffe-Jones, P., Maynard, B., Oxman, M., Pullin, A., Randall, N.P., Sharples, J., Stott, J. and Vale, L. (2022) Lessons from working across fields to develop a framework for informed choices. Research for All, 6 (1).

Nicky Randall Lessons from UPLOAD. OCR..pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (613kB) | Preview


In late 2018, Iain Chalmers, Andy Oxman and others from the Informed Health Choices team convened a cross-field forum to develop a generic framework of key concepts for thinking critically about claims, research and choices about interventions, with the aim of supporting ‘informed choices’. We define an informed choice as one that is based on critical understanding of the relevant available evidence. This paper describes the process of that cross-field engagement, and reflects on how consensus was reached on the generic framework. Working in an alliance of 24 researchers from across fields to develop the Key Concepts for Informed Choices framework, we learned three lessons about cross-field working: (1) there was much agreement, despite diversity of views and experiences; (2) the applications of our work were broader than we could have imagined; and (3) we identified a wide range of problems that we have in common when making informed choices. Here we describe our experience of working together to develop the framework, and draw out lessons for others who may be involved in similar cross-field initiatives.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: cross-field, interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary, informed choices, consensus, evidence
Divisions: Agriculture and Environment (from 1.08.20)
Depositing User: Mrs Rachael Giles
Date Deposited: 22 Feb 2022 12:12
Last Modified: 22 Feb 2022 12:12
URI: https://hau.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/17813

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item